RESPONSE TO THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN

The first half of this article offers two possibilities how the argument Kojonen makes might be vulnerable to other new developments in evolutionary science and psychology—potential broadsides that threaten sink salvaged ship design once again. Work on development life suggests is a simplification surrounding environmental information, therefore does not generate information. Second, psychology pareidolia we find as bias our information processing, rather than observing something exists. second critique metaphors use describe God world shape approaches solving theological philosophical questions (particularly theodicy). I offer some organic place usual mechanistic think about could reformulated.